Funny how each of these offices are clearly not on the same page - are they? Why is that now? Check the date on the above article as May of 2007. Now read this article from December of 2007.
December is when they were bringing down the indictments. Meaning not only did the FBI get wrong what was going on, but they were commending on a case that was obviously still being investigated. Which is a huge "no no" when it comes to open investigations, ESPECIALLY if there's victims of sex trafficking. If there's a question that a woman has been raped or trafficked, you can't comment on an open case without affecting that case possibly irreparably. So why was the FBI in such a hurry to comment there was "no trafficking" going on when the case wasn't done being investigated yet? Good question huh?
You might also note no author's name appears on the article. Makes me think the only way to get it published was someone had to not take responsibility.