What are the "approved" classes teaching you about what "trafficking" and a "trafficker" is at the moment? How they operate? How they find their victims? Who their victims are? How to find a trafficker? Let's break down what the typical training/education is right now coming out of the Office of Trafficking in Persons who by the way has no competition. They are funding and approving and hiring the ONLY programs and resources out there. They are approving the media even, the speakers, the teachers, the panels, even speakers at Congress. Let's examine what they teach you:
The victim: One victim really pushed down the American throat is Theresa Flores. She is a blond woman was a teenager at the time.
Method of procurement: She was lured out of her home off the internet and posed for a pornographic photo. Then she was "blackmailed" by this man to work for him as a prostitute while she hid it from her family.
How he forced her: His threat was the fear of exposure of the photo.
Escape: Her solution to the situation was to move away where she then told her father.
These are the images they give you of the "traffickers": http://turnto10.com/news/local/17-people-arrested-after-human-trafficking-sting-in-cranston
Here's another photo of "traffickers" below. Is this true? Innocent until proven guilty but probably. I'm having you note however most of the photos we get are that of lower income looking under educated people of color who once in a while are female. The relationship is portrayed usually as the "typical" Pimps Up and Ho's Down type of Bishop Don Juan image of a trafficker, or a sanitized word for "pimp".
The fact that the Emperor’s Club was operating on an international basis indicates that more than likely it was connected with powerful forces (re, the intelligence services of a foreign country) that could offer it protection and cover. In short, the ‘escort service’ most likely served a dual role as a blackmailing operation for America’s power elite, and given the fact that Spitzer is Jewish and that it was an ‘Israeli shop’ indicates he thought he was safe.
Again, if it was otherwise, Eliot would have been set up in a sting as a "john" NOT have the tape leaked to the press as what happened. Notice it says "Eliot thought he was safe because he was Jewish with a Jewish shop".
In other words, Eliot's case PROVES MY POINT THAT IS "END DEMAND", OR ARRESTING JOHNS, INCREASES SEX TRAFFICKING IN THE USA.
IT ALSO PROVES MY POINT THAT IT INCREASES VIOLENCE AND DANGER TO WOMEN WHERE IT'S FEARED BY THE JOHNS.
When Eliot arrested competitors for them essentially, although not hired outright, he was still paid. Maybe not with cash, but with the currency of "protection" as his payment. That means he's working for the traffickers, i.e., one of them.
Meaning that when this couple went down as "promoting prostitution" rather than "trafficking", I propose he was protecting them even then by virtue of this protection from harsher charges. Meaning he's still part of their operation and therefore a trafficker in my opinion.
What he did was not have sex in his personal bedroom. What he did was not buy the services of a sex worker.
What he did was he knowingly engaged in buying a woman he knew was being controlled, and by arresting competitors, and protecting his service, he was engaging in trafficking himself. Now that I would say is a "trafficker" and not a "john". Hence why I say Eliot is a trafficker, and not a "john".